New World Order, What is the New world Order, NWO, What is NWO what caused NWO, what caused New World Order, What caused the New World Order sitemap, site map, google sitemap contact sword of power.org, contact about NWO About Sword of power, Sword of power NWO site link exchange, Links, NWO links NWO forum, New World Order forum, The New World Order forum, New world Order Blog Take action against NWO, New world order, new world order help,

SwordOfPower.org BLOG

A selection of postings and other updates from the webmaster of Sword Of Power.

Posted on ezinearticles.com 19 March 2010

Insane as it may sound - and it is insane - the UK police state (sorry, criminal justice system) does not serve the public, but the criminals. Maybe that's unfair. Not just the criminal justice system but the entire system. And here I speak not just as a campaigner for civil liberties, for true democracy and against the Big Brother world, but also as a Magistrate, a volunteer part-time judge. How long I will remain one if I continue writing like this is a different question but the point is, I speak from experience.

Sure, we can listen to all sorts of statistics of how many arrest the police have made, how many successful prosecutions have been brought and how many dangerous people jailed. We can likewise watch news reporting about major drug operations or rapists and murderers having been convicted. But these are meaningless numbers and exceptional cases. In the magistrates courts we do not deal with the most serious of crimes, such as rape and murder. But what we do deal with is 95% of all criminal cases in the UK.

The idea of having magistrates is for ordinary, local people to administer justice in their area. But of course this does not allow for centralised control, so more and more laws, minimum sentences and mandatory sentencing guidelines have been introduced over recent years. Even if the intention was a good one (to eliminate inconsistent sentencing), the result is ever less discretion to such an extent that many of us joke about soon being replaced by a computer. And indeed our guidelines are in many cases so structured and prescriptive, that one could well give them to a child and after ticking a few boxes, they would likely be able to point at the prescribed sentence.

This would work well, was it not for the fact that each case is different and every defendant's circumstances are different. The sentence for someone who drove without insurance, knowing fully well that he was not insured, is the same as for someone whose insurance policy was cancelled unbeknown to him and who therefore committed an offence unknowingly. Or at least it is the same as far as the book is concerned. Magistrate's will likely use any discretion they still have in order to help the latter as much as they can.
Likewise, is it an offence not to ensure regular attendance of one's child at school. The prosecution does not need to show if one person did so carelessly or negligently as opposed to another. Neither is it a defence to say that one is trying hard, that one is struggling as a single mum without a father figure to help instill discipline or that one has a problem child at hand but that all the other children in the family attend school as one would expect. The attendance record alone decides if you are guilty or not; if you are now suddenly a criminal or not. And because it is a strict liability offence, Magistrates can only be lenient on the sentence if appropriate. They cannot stop you getting a criminal conviction.

On the other side, people who truly do not care about anyone but themselves and who respect nothing and no-one, real criminals, will not be dealt with in a way which is truly a deterrent. Remember we are not talking about murderers who get a life sentence but the 95% of all criminal cases that get dealt with by magistrates. And magistrates can in most cases give no more than 4-5 months imprisonment (for an offence where a guilty plea was entered). And if this is the sentence for the worst cases, than the reader can guess what an average sentence is likely to be. But honestly, custody is discouraged as a sentence for anyone but dangerous individuals in any case, due to lack of prison space, As a result it is not at all uncommon for someone to be in and out of court for years, making a mockery of the system, before being sent inside.

So, do we need more prisons and harsher sentences? If we listen to politicians and the media, maybe so. But the truth is that very, very few people indeed can be called "evil". Most criminals are also victims, be it of alcohol or drug addiction, upbringing, childhood experiences, bad influences or similar. This does not mean that such people are not responsible for their actions but that we must be careful where to lay the blame, or better, where to look for reasons. A vast amount of crime is drug related. No-one who has ever met a drug addict can deny that these are sad individuals who need help. Likewise a vast number of violence happens under the influence of alcohol. You can punish an alcoholic for what they do when they are drunk out of their senses, but this will not stop them from getting drunk again. I simply cannot judge an addict as simply bad or evil, even though their actions may well be wrong. Therefore, while punishment may be "just", it will not address the cause.

Many of my colleagues say that we are a criminal court and not social workers and I agree. This is why I said earlier that it isn't just the criminal justice system but the entire system which is the problem. Nowhere is this clearer than in what we are doing to our children. Children need love and care and a gently guiding hand. But they also need clear boundaries and in some instances punishment, not for being bad but so to enforce those boundaries, which will then teach them the common values they need to adhere to. But true to form, we have managed to criminalise everyone who dares discipline a child or youth, be it a neighbour, a teacher or even the child's parents. Hitting your child makes you a criminal. I have seen a father prosecuted because his teenage daughter hit her head against a wall during an argument where he was alleged to have pushed her. I have also seen neighbours of delinquents prosecuted for unlawful imprisonment after doing a "citizens arrest". There is no room left for anyone to enforce those boundaries, Instead of a telling off or a slap behind the ears for misbehaving, people now call the police and the child ends up in front of us. Welcome to the criminal justice system! And having got arrested and introduced to the courts so early on, what deterrence does another criminal conviction hold? Or another arrest?

We are breeding a generation of delinquents who have never been taught respect. And because this will make the situation worse and worse, we as a society will more and more experience crime and violence. The solution seems clear but it is too simple and too logical to be taken seriously. We need to allow common sense back into our lives. We need to stop prosecuting people just because we can and apply a true "interest of justice" test to all prosecutions. We need to allow parents to get on with what they do best and not get obsessed with the few exceptions that get so much publicity. We need to address causes and not just deal with symptoms. But what we do not need is more laws, more police, more CCTV cameras, ID and DNA databases, internet surveillance, or criminalisation of expressing your opinions and views. None of this will address the causes. It will merely punish the public by turning our country ever more into a police state.

As Featured On EzineArticles


Posted on ezinearticles.com 16 March 2010

Common sense doesn't count for much today. At least that seems true for the West: USA, Canada, Europe, Australia. In a world where there is a law for everything, a government agency for any eventuality and certainly a tax for all of life's pleasures, common sense seems a bit out of date. I mean, how many people have died from terrorist attacks compared to the number of deaths on our roads? And would we not be better of fighting terrorism by not giving people a good reason for being so angry? But of course that's much too sensible. Instead we continue our foreign policies unchanged and introduce more and more laws that strip us of our freedom. Is there somewhere left in the world where one can still go about one's daily life in a way which is in proportion to the real threat? And where the government fears the people not the other way round?

Our criminal justice systems are a good example. There are more and more strict liability laws affecting ordinary and honest people. Here in the UK it is a criminal offence not to ensure regular school attendance of your child. Not intention, recklessness or negligence needs to be proved by the prosecution. A fall in attendance without good reason (i.e. illness) is sufficient. Or car insurance. If you don't have it, you are guilty. It doesn't matter if you have been squeaking clean up until now but the insurance cancelled your policy due to a failed payment. Or even by mistake. That's no excuse. Or rather, it's no defence! Since I happen to be a magistrate, I can honestly say that we often try our level best to keep the "damage" done in such a case to a minimum. In other words we can keep the sentence passed as low as possible. But we will still have to pass the minimum sentence if one is prescribed by law and there will still be a criminal conviction against that person. The way police and prosecution authorities seem to work is that everyone who CAN be prosecuted WILL be prosecuted.

I would like to live in a country where sensible members of the community decide if someone is a criminal and not a book with very broad definitions in it. I also want to live in a country where something that costs 10 bucks is sold at 10 bucks and not 9.99. Can't we be treated like adults? Why do commercials talk to us as if we were all stupid? And even more important, why do politicians do this? Do they really believe anyone else thinks that party politics is important? If it was, why does nothing ever change regardless of which party governs? Isn't there a place where an assembly/parliament/congress genuinely represents the interest of the people? Can someone please tell me? And if there is, would the have let the banks collapse and locked up those responsible? There doesn't seem any money for anything else but there is always plenty to channel into the pockets of the rich. In fact how can the banking system be allowed to be in private hands at all, if it is so vital? Is there a country where the banks are all state-run?

How can it be that we get more and more food and farming related laws imposed on us which make it ever more difficult to be self-sufficient and to supply local communities with local produce in a simple and uncomplicated fashion? Instead only large companies have the resources to deal with all the bureaucracy and to obtain all the licences needed to sell food. If you are a hunter in the UK and you shoot deer, you cannot just sell the meet. Neither can you just give it away. Not even to relatives or friends. Not unless you have gone through the formalities required and invested in a chilled larder and so on. The sad truth is that food will soon be totally controlled at every stage of the process just like our finances, movement and internet activity. Where can I go where people still apply common sense and where the government has not handed power over to private interests. Where I'm allowed to keep livestock and grow food without microchips and official inspections; without mass-slaughter of my herds because of a fabricated panic over some harmless disease; without Monsanto trying to own nature's fertility with monsters such as terminator seeds.

If there is such a place, I want to know. No doubt, its days are numbered but still, I want to know.

Humanity has survived up until now without the protection of an over-dominant mother-state which tells us what we are allowed to do and when and how. But now we are being brought to the brink of extermination by a system that makes us believe we need it to survive. As Featured On EzineArticles



Posted on 26 October 2009
I compiled the below for friends and colleagues in the UK but you will find it interesting wherever you are as the mentioned substances seem to appear in almost all the vaccines.

Dear All,

As you know the government is preparing to vaccinate all of us against swine flu and has ordered 130 million doses, enough for the two jabs one needs for the 60-odd million people in this country.
The press reports that most of the vaccines will be Pandermix, made by GlaxoSmithKline. As this (http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDF ... 32-en6.pdf) document from the EMEA (European Medicines Agency) shows, Pandermix contains Squalene as adjuvant and Thiomersal as preservative, among other ingredients. While there is plenty of information available about the toxicity of these two substances, I found the below letter particularly interesting. It was an open letter by Dr Seefeldt a German doctor of internal medicine to the authorities and I have translated parts of it.

“All German vaccines including Pandermix [mentioned above] contain:

1)Squalene, a very dangerous adjuvant… Squalene can induce autoimmunity. Autoimmune disease of organs such as heart, lung and kidneys eventually lead to death, even today, there is not cure. Scientifically Squalene is urgently suspected to be a cause if not the cause of gulf war syndrome. [then follows further detail and reference to scientific studies].

2) Thiomersal=Thimerosal, a highly toxic and carcinogenic preservative that is constituted to 49.6% of mercury. Mercury is the most poisonous non-radioactive element in the world and is poisonous in even very small quantities. ( Mutter, J. et al: Comments on the article the toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds by Clarkson and Magos, Crit. Rev. Toxicol.2007 Jul; 37(6): 537-549 ) This the worlds most toxic non-radioactive element is the central atom in the Thiomersal molecule. Thiomersal shouldn’t be used in any German vaccine since 2004 but is unfortunately contained in all German swine flu vaccines and Pandermix, the state-recommended vaccine, contains 5 micrograms. That’s 10 micrograms Thiomersal for the two injections.
Mercury is carcinogenic and for carcinogenic substances there is no safe level. ( Lutz, W.K.: A true threshold dose in chemical carcinogenesis cannot be defined for a population, irrespective of the mode of action, Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2000, 19 (10):566-8;discussion 571-2 )
Mercury is highly neurotoxic, nephrotoxic and hepatotoxic and is harmful to all human tissue.”

Dr Seefeldt then continues to explain in what form mercury from Thiomersal is metabolized and that once it reaches the brain it can never be removed. He mentions that he is currently authoring a study book on carcinogenicity and knows what he is talking about. He calls it irresponsible to add these substances to vaccines especially as there is no need for them. In the US there are some vaccines without them. He calls on the German drug regulator, who said there were no concerns over the safety of the vaccines, to stop telling lies.



Posted on 23 September 2009

One can argue how sinister or not it is that the one-dollar bill has freemasonry symbolism on it. And certainly the meaning of the phrase "Annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum" is subject to some hot debate, some saying it announces the New World Order, some putting it into historic context or American independence and a new age of liberation.
I have collated the information below from non-conspiracy sources on the interent and will leave you to make up your own mind as to what the true translation should be.

dollar note


Posted on SwordOfPower.org Forum on 31 August 2009

"If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear"
This rather naive statement is often used to counter any arguments against a surveillance society. And in a way it is true. If you don't mind the state knowing EVERYTHING about you and if you don't mind the consequences this can bring, then you may be ok. But people who use such arguments generally assume that Big Brother technology will ever only be used on "others", such as criminals and terrorists. It assumes a benevolent state.

Well, the Nazi time in Germany was only about 60 years ago, about one human lifetime. I don't like using Germany's past as an example because of all the stereotypes attached to it and because of the illusion that it was a war of good against evil. But here I'd like to make an exception. When I was in my teens, I had various rebellious times where I stood up for my rights by writing complaints, appealing against headmaster decisions and taking part in protests. My old landlady always reacted in the same manner. Don't do that. You'll get into trouble. I know it's hard to imagine, but so many old people there have still got this old mindset that if you complain, protest or otherwise don't keep your head down, you'll get into trouble, get locked up and certainly ruin your chances for the future. For me it was just the talk of silly old people who haven't gone with the time. And of course it was ok to complain and no, I didn't get locked up. But to assume all government bodies will always be benevolent, when history so recent that people can still remember it clearly proves the opposite, seems rather stupid.

One only has to imagine how your visit to this forum will be viewed by the analytical software that will sooner or later (or maybe does already?) profile everyone's internet usage. I think to say that you will be labelled as someone who asks too many question is probably the understatement of the year. Potential terrorist? Just because you want to do something about the NWO doesn't mean any violent intentions whatsoever but will Big Brother see it this way?

Another point of course is that whistle blowing and exposés will be a thing of the past if your most intimate information is know and can be used to discredit or slander you or simply to embarrass or blackmail you into shutting up.


Posted on SwordOfPower.org Forum 31 August 2009
The following is an email I received from a friend in mid-August 2009. By friend I don't mean someone I only know from online forums but a personal friend. His research into and chance encounter with the swine flu vaccine, while not surprising, is nonetheless an eye-opener.

"I have been interested over the last few months in the "information" that we in the UK have been receiving about swine flu. Although testing for the H1N1 virus has been few and far between, the number of recorded cases has been rising steadily, and sometimes dramatically. There has been little mention lately of the number of normal flu cases. We have recently heard that the authorities in the UK have arranged for approximately 60 million doses of flu vaccine to be made available to the public later in the year. One significant concern is the ingredients of this vaccine. The swine flu vaccine (which Baxter obtained a patent for LAST YEAR) is thought to contain a mercury compound called thiomerosal which is very likely damaging. Another compound is squalene. I have been trying to find out whether UK vaccines will contain squalene.

Today I attended a job interview at a major pharmaceutical/chemical company. I had already been told that this job had something to do with swine flu vaccine. At the interview I was told that my job would be to purify squalene which would then be sent to customers who would add it to the swine flu vaccine. Vaccines containing squalene have been linked to a host of autoimmune disorders including Gulf War syndrome. From what I can gather, in the first Gulf War, there were 4 out of 37 countries who administered squalene containing vaccines to the their military personnel : Australia, New Zealand, The UK and the USA. These are the only 4 countries whose forces were afflicted with Gulf War syndrome (depleted uranium notwithstanding), and these soldiers tested positive to squalene antibodies.

It seems that squalene, when injected, primes the immune system to recognise and attack it, and this is exteremely undesirable because squalene occurs naturally in your nervous system and brain. Hence the unremitting autoimmune disorders that affected those troops in the Gulf War."

Interview on Unity FM broadcast 11 August 2009
SwordOfPower was interviewed by the small muslim radio station Unity FM based in Birmingham. Sound file hopefully to follow soon. Salute to Unity FM for having the courage to discuss the New World Order so publicly.


Letter to the Editor, Independent Newspaper, 08 August 2009
I find it surprising that the article Russia Blamed for Cyber Terror Blitz (Saturday 8th August) makes the front page without offering a shred of evidence. Moscow may well be concerned with anti-Russian bias in Western mainstream media but bloggers in general tend to counter-blance this bias somewhat and so seem an obvious ally to Moscow in the case of Georgia. Your article on pages 24-5 of the same edition was very balanced however.

Posted on ezinearticles.com on 17 August 2009

We all know why it is a bad idea to privatise public services. The purpose of a public service is to serve the public and the purpose of a private company is to make profits for its shareholders. It doesn't need genius to see that the two are opposing interests. So why is it being done? Because politicians are in the pockets of private interest? Yes, basically one could put it this way. But how they sell it to us is the interesting part I want to focus on here. The part-privatisation (it was never called that) of the UK Royal Mail temporarily disappeared from the headlines in July 2009. For weeks we were told how we need the cash and expertise of the private sector because Royal Mail wasn't performing well and needed reforming and bringing into the 21st century. A non-UK company was the preferred bidder.

So what's the problem with Royal Mail?

Before we try to answer this let us look at the entertaining race which the extremely popular BBC motoring programme Top Gear broadcast that same month. Two of the presenters paid £0.39 for a first class stamp and posted it from an island in the very South West of the UK to a village on another island in the North Eastern most corner of the country. Royal Mail say they deliver a first class letter the very next day anywhere in the UK. So the BBC presenters jumped into a Porsche and drove all day and through the night in an attempt to beat the letter. Meanwhile the letter made its way through the 24hr postal system on vans, lorries and several planes. When the BBC presenters finally arrived at the letter's destination, the letter was already there waiting for them. The mail system had beaten the Porsche sports car and the two determined men.

So what is wrong with Royal Mail? The answer appears to be: Nothing! Apart maybe from the fact that it is too cheap to post things and that the British think their postal system is rubbish (because that's what they are being told). But when I left Germany 10 years ago, mail was more expensive and it normally took 3 days for a letter to arrive and I assume this is still the case. Yes! The mega-efficient Germans!
£0.39 for such a service, are you kidding? So what is it that needs brining into the 21st century? How much more efficient can you get?

But the way to privatisation is always the same. Starve the service of funding, make it appear like tax payers are not getting a good service and then pretend that privatisation is the only way forward. What Royal Mail needs is be tax-payer owned, retain a monopoly, charge fair prices (by this I mean more). If we stopped spending billions on buying banks' debts, on nuclear deterrent, on wars against civilians abroad for the benefit of private oil interests and on all the spying on law-abiding citizens, we would have plenty for all sorts of public services, which is what the money is really there for.

In my opinion privatisation is simply diverting tax money into private pockets. I'm not advocating communism, but public services should not be there to make money for private shareholders.

Posted on SwordOfPower Forum 26 July 2009
In the main pages of the website I briefly mention nutrition in the physical preparation section. Many of us today know that the food industry and of course bio-tech companies like Monsanto have become a pillar of the Big Brother system and therefore we aim to return to a simple principle of "as natural as possible is best". We have the choice what to eat (at least so far) and so once again can't really blame anyone else if we are depleting our bodies of what they need. I also find that listening to our bodies is a lot more practical than wanting science to deliver an answer to all our questions. How many times have we heard in the news about a new study "proving" this, that or the other and only a few weeks later, another study says the opposite. Every time the news media seem to think the latest study is the latest and truest science and make it look like something important. Important? No, not really. It only serves the study's authors' SELF-IMPORTANCE.

There is no service done to humanity either by creating genetically manipulated plants, even if with the intention of solving problems for humanity. That's because the plants aren't the problem, so we are achieving nothing other than to allow scientists play with our health and our lives so to satisfy their childish ambitions. Just look at Monsanto's terminator seeds. Can anyone ever come up with an excuse why such a thing could benefit humanity and not just the greed of a few for power over others?

Most religious people, be the Christian, Hindu, Muslim..., will object because they feel that it is wrong to mess around with God's creation. Many others just can't see the need, are concerned about the health effects of GM or, most seriously, fear the contamination of the natural world with GM products, effectively taking away the choice if we want GM or not. So how actually wants GM food? I think the answer is that there are still to many who don't care, who never read the ingredients of what they buy and who'd possibly even buy the publicity spin of the bio-tech companies.

Theun Mares recently mentioned GM food in the following excerpt:

"There are two types of prana, solar prana and planetray prana. We need BOTH, for together they form a whole. Solar prana is emitted by the sun, and planetary prana is emitted by the planet. Solar prana is positive, that is, masculine, whereas planetary prana is negative, or feminine. Solar prana is to oxygen what the spirit is to man, and planetary prana is to solar prana what the Dreamer is to the spirit. Oxygen without prana is useless to man, much like dead water. It can only sustain life for a very limited period of time. In fact, dead water IS water in which there is no prana, that is, the life-giving force. Even our food contains prana, except for processed food which is dead and therefore devoid of prana. This is why it is so important to eat FRESH food and NOT processed food. If you were to eat only processed food and drink only dead water, you would become ill and die very quickly. So you can see the threat that genetically modified crops hold for man. GM foods are no longer alive in the true sense of the word. They are fast becoming like processed food, and if it is allowed to continue, a great many people will die from malnutrition, which no doubt, the scientists who support GM foods will hotly deny! So, yes, sad as it is, MANY scientists and medical doctors today belong to the Old Sorcerers, and they are working towards killing us, but are too stupid to see it."

I didn't need to know about prana to reject GM but this is yet another wake-up call that we are getting into deep shit thanks to allowing others to impose their destructive and controlling ideas on us.

Posted on SwordoOfPower Forum 15 July 2009
The Big Brother Elite are continuing to strengthen their hold by centralising ever more power in the hands of the few and away from the people. It is said 75% of the laws in Europe are now made by the EU rather than the nation states - and most people know that the EU is by design undemocratic. Ever more EU law has to be complied with in even the most basic walks of life, turning every act into a bureaucratic nightmare. What Big Brother doesn't like is independent, free individuals and groups who can look after themselves, think for themselves and who are brave enough to act on their own knowledge. That's why they will, in the name of protecting the population, make it ever more difficult for you to own your own land, have animals, grow food, supply your own water and sell what you don't need yourself to your local community. You will only be allowed to sell or even give away any food if you comply with tight regulations, such as having all your animals tagged and making it possible to track all the food you produce. If all else fails, another "outbreak" of whatever virus will be used as excuse to slaughter all you animals in order to "contain" the epidemic.
If you have land on which you hunt deer, you can eat your own meet and currently it is ok to supply your direct family who live there with you. But as soon as you want to give venison away for free to your wider family or friends, you are bound by hygiene laws and need a temperature controlled larder.
As usual these laws "to protect us" are easy to comply with if you are a large company but not if you are a smallholder.

The sad thing is, it is exactly here where the future lies: a decentralised economy/society. If the countryside was full of smallholdings, producing most of their own food and co-operating with the local community for everything else, without centralised control, what would happen? Fewer food miles, direct relationship between producer and consumer, much less need for packaging, less power to companies such as the big supermarkets, the list goes on. Small-scale farming is what permaculture is designed for. It stands for permanent culture and offers an approach of observing natural ecosystems and then designing a system which is neither reliant on oil, chemicals and machinery, nor a return to drudgery. A smallholding is a lot more productive than a large farm due to the attention and design that can go into it. This is despite the machinery and chemicals used in conventional farming. Also, compare a field of wheat with a forest garden, where trees, smaller fruit trees, fruit bushes, vegetables, herbs etc all occupy the same space, but using vertical space as well. Not only do you get a lot more produce, but the different plants help each other. Some deter pests. Some bring up nutrients from deep down. Leaves fall and rot right where the leave mulch is wanted. Fruits fall and plants decay right where the nutrients can be recycled. Birds live in the trees right where the phosphate from their droppings is wanted. And best of all, woodland is the natural landscape of most temperate countries. If you left the place alone, it would turn into woodland. So nature wants to grow trees and instead of fighting nature, you work with it.

Permaculture is about more than gardening, however. It is also about knowing all the environmental factors of your land, the major wind directions, the angle of the sun throughout the seasons, and designing your plot accordingly. It is about designing your water supply in a way that makes use of gravity. It is about having work-intensive plants close to your house and less needy ones further away, about having your living space face south and your storage space north (if you are building a house), about using local materials and resources, about plant species and animal breeds that are suitable for the area and that are bred for being hardy rather than for unnatural productivity and prone to illness, about reusing old things instead of throw-away society, and, really, you can apply it to any area of life that you wish. It isn't anti progress or anti technology but pro sustainability and pro responsibility.

The excellent BBC programme A Farm for the Future is a good start if I have woken your interest. http://www.blinkx.com/video/a-farm-for-the-future-01/3PoPI8VF5JiuIM5Eig_mCA

Poseted on SwordOfPower Forum 27 May 2009
A message from the author of "The Toltec Teachings" series and spiritual teacher Theun Mares:

"Congratulations to you and your team for a truly LOVELY website! Well done and good luck! B-:)

One thing that came to mind when I was reading the contents of your website, is the analogy of the candle I use in the books.

The personal power of each and every man and woman can be likened to that of a candle flame. Some candles and their respective flames are big, whilst others are small, and some even tiny. But ALL of us have at least SOME personal power.

My message in this is that we do NOT have to be great warriors of the spirit, we do NOT have to be shakers and movers of the world, but IF ALL of us, each and every ONE of us were merely to light our candles, big, small or tiny, and STAND TOGETHER, what a LIGHT there would be in the world – a light that will literally, not figuratively, but LITERALLY transform the world overnight! The only thing that stops us from doing so is humanity’s sense of apathy, separativeness, the prejudices, preconceived assumptions and many judgements of the mind, and human pettiness! Drop this, even if just temporarily in the spirit of intelligent co-operation so as to offset the very immanent and very REAL darkness and evil threatening to destroy all life upon our planet, and suddenly the impossible becomes possible."

art by Tricia Contala 2009


Copyright2009©Sword Of Power.org ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

mail@swordofpower.org

Web Design and Graphic Design by: Tricia Contala