|
Posted on
ezinearticles.com 19 March 2010
Insane as it may sound - and it is insane - the
UK police state (sorry, criminal justice system) does not serve the
public, but the criminals. Maybe that's unfair. Not just the criminal
justice system but the entire system. And here I speak not just as a
campaigner for civil liberties, for true democracy and against the Big
Brother world, but also as a Magistrate, a volunteer part-time judge.
How long I will remain one if I continue writing like this is a
different question but the point is, I speak from experience.
Sure, we can listen to all sorts of statistics of how many arrest the
police have made, how many successful prosecutions have been brought
and how many dangerous people jailed. We can likewise watch news
reporting about major drug operations or rapists and murderers having
been convicted. But these are meaningless numbers and exceptional
cases. In the magistrates courts we do not deal with the most serious
of crimes, such as rape and murder. But what we do deal with is 95% of
all criminal cases in the UK.
The idea of having magistrates is for ordinary, local people to
administer justice in their area. But of course this does not allow for
centralised control, so more and more laws, minimum sentences and
mandatory sentencing guidelines have been introduced over recent years.
Even if the intention was a good one (to eliminate inconsistent
sentencing), the result is ever less discretion to such an extent that
many of us joke about soon being replaced by a computer. And indeed our
guidelines are in many cases so structured and prescriptive, that one
could well give them to a child and after ticking a few boxes, they
would likely be able to point at the prescribed sentence.
This would work well, was it not for the fact that each case is
different and every defendant's circumstances are different. The
sentence for someone who drove without insurance, knowing fully well
that he was not insured, is the same as for someone whose insurance
policy was cancelled unbeknown to him and who therefore committed an
offence unknowingly. Or at least it is the same as far as the book is
concerned. Magistrate's will likely use any discretion they still have
in order to help the latter as much as they can.
Likewise, is it an offence not to ensure regular attendance of one's
child at school. The prosecution does not need to show if one person
did so carelessly or negligently as opposed to another. Neither is it a
defence to say that one is trying hard, that one is struggling as a
single mum without a father figure to help instill discipline or that
one has a problem child at hand but that all the other children in the
family attend school as one would expect. The attendance record alone
decides if you are guilty or not; if you are now suddenly a criminal or
not. And because it is a strict liability offence, Magistrates can only
be lenient on the sentence if appropriate. They cannot stop you getting
a criminal conviction.
On the other side, people who truly do not care about anyone but
themselves and who respect nothing and no-one, real criminals, will not
be dealt with in a way which is truly a deterrent. Remember we are not
talking about murderers who get a life sentence but the 95% of all
criminal cases that get dealt with by magistrates. And magistrates can
in most cases give no more than 4-5 months imprisonment (for an offence
where a guilty plea was entered). And if this is the sentence for the
worst cases, than the reader can guess what an average sentence is
likely to be. But honestly, custody is discouraged as a sentence for
anyone but dangerous individuals in any case, due to lack of prison
space, As a result it is not at all uncommon for someone to be in and
out of court for years, making a mockery of the system, before being
sent inside.
So, do we need more prisons and harsher sentences? If we listen to
politicians and the media, maybe so. But the truth is that very, very
few people indeed can be called "evil". Most criminals are also
victims, be it of alcohol or drug addiction, upbringing, childhood
experiences, bad influences or similar. This does not mean that such
people are not responsible for their actions but that we must be
careful where to lay the blame, or better, where to look for reasons. A
vast amount of crime is drug related. No-one who has ever met a drug
addict can deny that these are sad individuals who need help. Likewise
a vast number of violence happens under the influence of alcohol. You
can punish an alcoholic for what they do when they are drunk out of
their senses, but this will not stop them from getting drunk again. I
simply cannot judge an addict as simply bad or evil, even though their
actions may well be wrong. Therefore, while punishment may be "just",
it will not address the cause.
Many of my colleagues say that we are a criminal court and not social
workers and I agree. This is why I said earlier that it isn't just the
criminal justice system but the entire system which is the problem.
Nowhere is this clearer than in what we are doing to our children.
Children need love and care and a gently guiding hand. But they also
need clear boundaries and in some instances punishment, not for being
bad but so to enforce those boundaries, which will then teach them the
common values they need to adhere to. But true to form, we have managed
to criminalise everyone who dares discipline a child or youth, be it a
neighbour, a teacher or even the child's parents. Hitting your child
makes you a criminal. I have seen a father prosecuted because his
teenage daughter hit her head against a wall during an argument where
he was alleged to have pushed her. I have also seen neighbours of
delinquents prosecuted for unlawful imprisonment after doing a
"citizens arrest". There is no room left for anyone to enforce those
boundaries, Instead of a telling off or a slap behind the ears for
misbehaving, people now call the police and the child ends up in front
of us. Welcome to the criminal justice system! And having got arrested
and introduced to the courts so early on, what deterrence does another
criminal conviction hold? Or another arrest?
We are breeding a generation of delinquents who have never been taught
respect. And because this will make the situation worse and worse, we
as a society will more and more experience crime and violence. The
solution seems clear but it is too simple and too logical to be taken
seriously. We need to allow common sense back into our lives. We need
to stop prosecuting people just because we can and apply a true
"interest of justice" test to all prosecutions. We need to allow
parents to get on with what they do best and not get obsessed with the
few exceptions that get so much publicity. We need to address causes
and not just deal with symptoms. But what we do not need is more laws,
more police, more CCTV cameras, ID and DNA databases, internet
surveillance, or criminalisation of expressing your opinions and views.
None of this will address the causes. It will merely punish the public
by turning our country ever more into a police state.
Posted on ezinearticles.com 16 March 2010
Common sense doesn't count for much today. At
least that seems true
for the West: USA, Canada, Europe, Australia. In a world where there is
a law for everything, a government agency for any eventuality and
certainly a tax for all of life's pleasures, common sense seems a bit
out of date. I mean, how many people have died from terrorist attacks
compared to the number of deaths on our roads? And would we not be
better of fighting terrorism by not giving people a good reason for
being so angry? But of course that's much too sensible. Instead we
continue our foreign policies unchanged and introduce more and more
laws that strip us of our freedom. Is there somewhere left in the world
where one can still go about one's daily life in a way which is in
proportion to the real threat? And where the government fears the
people not the other way round?
Our criminal justice systems are
a good example. There are more and more strict liability laws affecting
ordinary and honest people. Here in the UK it is a criminal offence not
to ensure regular school attendance of your child. Not intention,
recklessness or negligence needs to be proved by the prosecution. A
fall in attendance without good reason (i.e. illness) is sufficient. Or
car insurance. If you don't have it, you are guilty. It doesn't matter
if you have been squeaking clean up until now but the insurance
cancelled your policy due to a failed payment. Or even by mistake.
That's no excuse. Or rather, it's no defence! Since I happen to be a
magistrate, I can honestly say that we often try our level best to keep
the "damage" done in such a case to a minimum. In other words we can
keep the sentence passed as low as possible. But we will still have to
pass the minimum sentence if one is prescribed by law and there will
still be a criminal conviction against that person. The way police and
prosecution authorities seem to work is that everyone who CAN be
prosecuted WILL be prosecuted.
I would like to live in a country
where sensible members of the community decide if someone is a criminal
and not a book with very broad definitions in it. I also want to live
in a country where something that costs 10 bucks is sold at 10 bucks
and not 9.99. Can't we be treated like adults? Why do commercials talk
to us as if we were all stupid? And even more important, why do
politicians do this? Do they really believe anyone else thinks that
party politics is important? If it was, why does nothing ever change
regardless of which party governs? Isn't there a place where an
assembly/parliament/congress genuinely represents the interest of the
people? Can someone please tell me? And if there is, would the have let
the banks collapse and locked up those responsible? There doesn't seem
any money for anything else but there is always plenty to channel into
the pockets of the rich. In fact how can the banking system be allowed
to be in private hands at all, if it is so vital? Is there a country
where the banks are all state-run?
How can it be that we get more
and more food and farming related laws imposed on us which make it ever
more difficult to be self-sufficient and to supply local communities
with local produce in a simple and uncomplicated fashion? Instead only
large companies have the resources to deal with all the bureaucracy and
to obtain all the licences needed to sell food. If you are a hunter in
the UK and you shoot deer, you cannot just sell the meet. Neither can
you just give it away. Not even to relatives or friends. Not unless you
have gone through the formalities required and invested in a chilled
larder and so on. The sad truth is that food will soon be totally
controlled at every stage of the process just like our finances,
movement and internet activity. Where can I go where people still apply
common sense and where the government has not handed power over to
private interests. Where I'm allowed to keep livestock and grow food
without microchips and official inspections; without mass-slaughter of
my herds because of a fabricated panic over some harmless disease;
without Monsanto trying to own nature's fertility with monsters such as
terminator seeds.
If there is such a place, I want to know. No
doubt, its days are numbered but still, I want to know.
Humanity
has survived up until now without the protection of an over-dominant
mother-state which tells us what we are allowed to do and when and how.
But now we are being brought to the brink of extermination by a system
that makes us believe we need it to survive.
Posted on 26 October 2009
I compiled the below for friends and
colleagues in the UK but you will
find it interesting wherever you are as the mentioned substances seem
to appear in almost all the vaccines.
Dear All,
As you
know the government is preparing to vaccinate all of us against swine
flu and has ordered 130 million doses, enough for the two jabs one
needs for the 60-odd million people in this country.
The press reports that most of the vaccines will be Pandermix, made by
GlaxoSmithKline. As this (http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDF
...
32-en6.pdf)
document from the EMEA (European Medicines Agency) shows, Pandermix
contains Squalene as adjuvant and Thiomersal as preservative, among
other ingredients. While there is plenty of information available about
the toxicity of these two substances, I found the below letter
particularly interesting. It was an open letter by Dr Seefeldt a German
doctor of internal medicine to the authorities and I have translated
parts of it.
“All German vaccines including Pandermix [mentioned above] contain:
1)Squalene,
a very dangerous adjuvant… Squalene can induce autoimmunity. Autoimmune
disease of organs such as heart, lung and kidneys eventually lead to
death, even today, there is not cure. Scientifically Squalene is
urgently suspected to be a cause if not the cause of gulf war syndrome.
[then follows further detail and reference to scientific studies].
2)
Thiomersal=Thimerosal, a highly toxic and carcinogenic preservative
that is constituted to 49.6% of mercury. Mercury is the most poisonous
non-radioactive element in the world and is poisonous in even very
small quantities. ( Mutter, J. et al: Comments on the article the
toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds by Clarkson and Magos,
Crit. Rev. Toxicol.2007 Jul; 37(6): 537-549 ) This the worlds most
toxic non-radioactive element is the central atom in the Thiomersal
molecule. Thiomersal shouldn’t be used in any German vaccine since 2004
but is unfortunately contained in all German swine flu vaccines and
Pandermix, the state-recommended vaccine, contains 5 micrograms. That’s
10 micrograms Thiomersal for the two injections.
Mercury is
carcinogenic and for carcinogenic substances there is no safe level. (
Lutz, W.K.: A true threshold dose in chemical carcinogenesis cannot be
defined for a population, irrespective of the mode of action, Hum. Exp.
Toxicol. 2000, 19 (10):566-8;discussion 571-2 )
Mercury is highly neurotoxic, nephrotoxic and hepatotoxic and is
harmful to all human tissue.”
Dr
Seefeldt then continues to explain in what form mercury from Thiomersal
is metabolized and that once it reaches the brain it can never be
removed. He mentions that he is currently authoring a study book on
carcinogenicity and knows what he is talking about. He calls it
irresponsible to add these substances to vaccines especially as there
is no need for them. In the US there are some vaccines without them. He
calls on the German drug regulator, who said there were no concerns
over the safety of the vaccines, to stop telling lies.
Posted on 23 September 2009
One
can argue how sinister or not it is that the one-dollar bill has
freemasonry symbolism on it. And certainly the meaning of the phrase
"Annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum" is subject to some hot debate,
some saying it announces the New World Order, some putting it into
historic context or American independence and a new age of liberation.
I have collated the information below from non-conspiracy sources on
the interent and will leave you to make up your own mind as to what the
true translation should be.
Posted on SwordOfPower.org Forum on
31 August 2009
"If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear"
This rather naive statement is often used to counter any arguments
against a surveillance society. And in a way it is true. If you don't
mind the state knowing EVERYTHING about you and if you don't mind the
consequences this can bring, then you may be ok. But people who use
such arguments generally assume that Big Brother technology will ever
only be used on "others", such as criminals and terrorists. It assumes
a benevolent state.
Well, the Nazi time in Germany was only about 60 years ago, about one
human lifetime. I don't like using Germany's past as an example because
of all the stereotypes attached to it and because of the illusion that
it was a war of good against evil. But here I'd like to make an
exception. When I was in my teens, I had various rebellious times where
I stood up for my rights by writing complaints, appealing against
headmaster decisions and taking part in protests. My old landlady
always reacted in the same manner. Don't do that. You'll get into
trouble. I know it's hard to imagine, but so many old people there have
still got this old mindset that if you complain, protest or otherwise
don't keep your head down, you'll get into trouble, get locked up and
certainly ruin your chances for the future. For me it was just the talk
of silly old people who haven't gone with the time. And of course it
was ok to complain and no, I didn't get locked up. But to assume all
government bodies will always be benevolent, when history so recent
that people can still remember it clearly proves the opposite, seems
rather stupid.
One only has to imagine how your visit to this forum will be viewed by
the analytical software that will sooner or later (or maybe does
already?) profile everyone's internet usage. I think to say that you
will be labelled as someone who asks too many question is probably the
understatement of the year. Potential terrorist? Just because you want
to do something about the NWO doesn't mean any violent intentions
whatsoever but will Big Brother see it this way?
Another point of course is that whistle blowing and exposés will
be a thing of the past if your most intimate information is know and
can be used to discredit or slander you or simply to embarrass or
blackmail you into shutting up.
Posted on SwordOfPower.org Forum 31
August 2009
The following is an email I received from a friend in mid-August 2009.
By friend I don't mean someone I only know from online forums but a
personal friend. His research into and chance encounter with the swine
flu vaccine, while not surprising, is nonetheless an eye-opener.
"I have been interested over the last few months in the "information"
that we in the UK have been receiving about swine flu. Although testing
for the H1N1 virus has been few and far between, the number of recorded
cases has been rising steadily, and sometimes dramatically. There has
been little mention lately of the number of normal flu cases. We have
recently heard that the authorities in the UK have arranged for
approximately 60 million doses of flu vaccine to be made available to
the public later in the year. One significant concern is the
ingredients of this vaccine. The swine flu vaccine (which Baxter
obtained a patent for LAST YEAR) is thought to contain a mercury
compound called thiomerosal which is very likely damaging. Another
compound is squalene. I have been trying to find out whether UK
vaccines will contain squalene.
Today I attended a job interview at a major pharmaceutical/chemical
company. I had already been told that this job had something to do with
swine flu vaccine. At the interview I was told that my job would be to
purify squalene which would then be sent to customers who would add it
to the swine flu vaccine. Vaccines containing squalene have been linked
to a host of autoimmune disorders including Gulf War syndrome. From
what I can gather, in the first Gulf War, there were 4 out of 37
countries who administered squalene containing vaccines to the their
military personnel : Australia, New Zealand, The UK and the USA. These
are the only 4 countries whose forces were afflicted with Gulf War
syndrome (depleted uranium notwithstanding), and these soldiers tested
positive to squalene antibodies.
It seems that squalene, when injected, primes the immune system to
recognise and attack it, and this is exteremely undesirable because
squalene occurs naturally in your nervous system and brain. Hence the
unremitting autoimmune disorders that affected those troops in the Gulf
War."
Interview on Unity
FM broadcast 11 August 2009
SwordOfPower was interviewed by the small muslim radio station Unity FM
based in Birmingham. Sound file hopefully to follow soon. Salute to
Unity FM for having the courage to discuss the New World Order so
publicly.
Letter to the
Editor, Independent Newspaper, 08 August 2009
I find it surprising that the article Russia Blamed for Cyber Terror
Blitz (Saturday 8th August) makes the front page without offering a
shred of evidence. Moscow may well be concerned with anti-Russian bias
in Western mainstream media but bloggers in general tend to
counter-blance this bias somewhat and so seem an obvious ally to Moscow
in the case of Georgia. Your article on pages 24-5 of the same edition
was very balanced however.
Posted on ezinearticles.com on 17
August 2009
We all know why it is a bad idea to privatise public
services. The
purpose of a public service is to serve the public and the purpose of a
private company is to make profits for its shareholders. It doesn't
need genius to see that the two are opposing interests. So why is it
being done? Because politicians are in the pockets of private interest?
Yes, basically one could put it this way. But how they sell it to us is
the interesting part I want to focus on here. The part-privatisation
(it was never called that) of the UK Royal Mail temporarily disappeared
from the headlines in July 2009. For weeks we were told how we need the
cash and expertise of the private sector because Royal Mail wasn't
performing well and needed reforming and bringing into the 21st
century. A non-UK company was the preferred bidder.
So what's the problem with Royal Mail?
Before
we try to answer this let us look at the entertaining race which the
extremely popular BBC motoring programme Top Gear broadcast that same
month. Two of the presenters paid £0.39 for a first class stamp
and
posted it from an island in the very South West of the UK to a village
on another island in the North Eastern most corner of the country.
Royal Mail say they deliver a first class letter the very next day
anywhere in the UK. So the BBC presenters jumped into a Porsche and
drove all day and through the night in an attempt to beat the letter.
Meanwhile the letter made its way through the 24hr postal system on
vans, lorries and several planes. When the BBC presenters finally
arrived at the letter's destination, the letter was already there
waiting for them. The mail system had beaten the Porsche sports car and
the two determined men.
So what is wrong with Royal Mail? The
answer appears to be: Nothing! Apart maybe from the fact that it is too
cheap to post things and that the British think their postal system is
rubbish (because that's what they are being told). But when I left
Germany 10 years ago, mail was more expensive and it normally took 3
days for a letter to arrive and I assume this is still the case. Yes!
The mega-efficient Germans!
£0.39 for such a service, are you
kidding? So what is it that needs brining into the 21st century? How
much more efficient can you get?
But the way to privatisation is
always the same. Starve the service of funding, make it appear like tax
payers are not getting a good service and then pretend that
privatisation is the only way forward. What Royal Mail needs is be
tax-payer owned, retain a monopoly, charge fair prices (by this I mean
more). If we stopped spending billions on buying banks' debts, on
nuclear deterrent, on wars against civilians abroad for the benefit of
private oil interests and on all the spying on law-abiding citizens, we
would have plenty for all sorts of public services, which is what the
money is really there for.
In my opinion privatisation is simply
diverting tax money into private pockets. I'm not advocating communism,
but public services should not be there to make money for private
shareholders.
Posted on SwordOfPower Forum
26 July 2009
In the main pages of the website I briefly mention nutrition in the
physical preparation section. Many of us today know that the food
industry and of course bio-tech companies like Monsanto have become a
pillar of the Big Brother system and therefore we aim to return to a
simple principle of "as natural as possible is best". We have the
choice what to eat (at least so far) and so once again can't really
blame anyone else if we are depleting our bodies of what they need. I
also find that listening to our bodies is a lot more practical than
wanting science to deliver an answer to all our questions. How many
times have we heard in the news about a new study "proving" this, that
or the other and only a few weeks later, another study says the
opposite. Every time the news media seem to think the latest study is
the latest and truest science and make it look like something
important. Important? No, not really. It only serves the study's
authors' SELF-IMPORTANCE.
There is no service done to humanity either by creating genetically
manipulated plants, even if with the intention of solving problems for
humanity. That's because the plants aren't the problem, so we are
achieving nothing other than to allow scientists play with our health
and our lives so to satisfy their childish ambitions. Just look at
Monsanto's terminator seeds. Can anyone ever come up with an excuse why
such a thing could benefit humanity and not just the greed of a few for
power over others?
Most religious people, be the Christian, Hindu, Muslim..., will object
because they feel that it is wrong to mess around with God's creation.
Many others just can't see the need, are concerned about the health
effects of GM or, most seriously, fear the contamination of the natural
world with GM products, effectively taking away the choice if we want
GM or not. So how actually wants GM food? I think the answer is that
there are still to many who don't care, who never read the ingredients
of what they buy and who'd possibly even buy the publicity spin of the
bio-tech companies.
Theun Mares recently mentioned GM food in the following excerpt:
"There are two types of prana, solar prana and planetray prana. We need
BOTH, for together they form a whole. Solar prana is emitted by the
sun, and planetary prana is emitted by the planet. Solar prana is
positive, that is, masculine, whereas planetary prana is negative, or
feminine. Solar prana is to oxygen what the spirit is to man, and
planetary prana is to solar prana what the Dreamer is to the spirit.
Oxygen without prana is useless to man, much like dead water. It can
only sustain life for a very limited period of time. In fact, dead
water IS water in which there is no prana, that is, the life-giving
force. Even our food contains prana, except for processed food which is
dead and therefore devoid of prana. This is why it is so important to
eat FRESH food and NOT processed food. If you were to eat only
processed food and drink only dead water, you would become ill and die
very quickly. So you can see the threat that genetically modified crops
hold for man. GM foods are no longer alive in the true sense of the
word. They are fast becoming like processed food, and if it is allowed
to continue, a great many people will die from malnutrition, which no
doubt, the scientists who support GM foods will hotly deny! So, yes,
sad as it is, MANY scientists and medical doctors today belong to the
Old Sorcerers, and they are working towards killing us, but are too
stupid to see it."
I didn't need to know about prana to reject GM but this is yet another
wake-up call that we are getting into deep shit thanks to allowing
others to impose their destructive and controlling ideas on us.
Posted on SwordoOfPower Forum
15 July 2009
The Big Brother Elite are continuing to strengthen their hold by
centralising ever more power in the hands of the few and away from the
people. It is said 75% of the laws in Europe are now made by the EU
rather than the nation states - and most people know that the EU is by
design undemocratic. Ever more EU law has to be complied with in even
the most basic walks of life, turning every act into a bureaucratic
nightmare. What Big Brother doesn't like is independent, free
individuals and groups who can look after themselves, think for
themselves and who are brave enough to act on their own knowledge.
That's why they will, in the name of protecting the population, make it
ever more difficult for you to own your own land, have animals, grow
food, supply your own water and sell what you don't need yourself to
your local community. You will only be allowed to sell or even give
away any food if you comply with tight regulations, such as having all
your animals tagged and making it possible to track all the food you
produce. If all else fails, another "outbreak" of whatever virus will
be used as excuse to slaughter all you animals in order to "contain"
the epidemic.
If you have land on which you hunt deer, you can eat your own meet and
currently it is ok to supply your direct family who live there with
you. But as soon as you want to give venison away for free to your
wider family or friends, you are bound by hygiene laws and need a
temperature controlled larder.
As usual these laws "to protect us" are easy to comply with if you are
a large company but not if you are a smallholder.
The sad thing is, it is exactly here where the future lies: a
decentralised economy/society. If the countryside was full of
smallholdings, producing most of their own food and co-operating with
the local community for everything else, without centralised control,
what would happen? Fewer food miles, direct relationship between
producer and consumer, much less need for packaging, less power to
companies such as the big supermarkets, the list goes on. Small-scale
farming is what permaculture is designed for. It stands for permanent
culture and offers an approach of observing natural ecosystems and then
designing a system which is neither reliant on oil, chemicals and
machinery, nor a return to drudgery. A smallholding is a lot more
productive than a large farm due to the attention and design that can
go into it. This is despite the machinery and chemicals used in
conventional farming. Also, compare a field of wheat with a forest
garden, where trees, smaller fruit trees, fruit bushes, vegetables,
herbs etc all occupy the same space, but using vertical space as well.
Not only do you get a lot more produce, but the different plants help
each other. Some deter pests. Some bring up nutrients from deep down.
Leaves fall and rot right where the leave mulch is wanted. Fruits fall
and plants decay right where the nutrients can be recycled. Birds live
in the trees right where the phosphate from their droppings is wanted.
And best of all, woodland is the natural landscape of most temperate
countries. If you left the place alone, it would turn into woodland. So
nature wants to grow trees and instead of fighting nature, you work
with it.
Permaculture is about more than gardening, however. It is also about
knowing all the environmental factors of your land, the major wind
directions, the angle of the sun throughout the seasons, and designing
your plot accordingly. It is about designing your water supply in a way
that makes use of gravity. It is about having work-intensive plants
close to your house and less needy ones further away, about having your
living space face south and your storage space north (if you are
building a house), about using local materials and resources, about
plant species and animal breeds that are suitable for the area and that
are bred for being hardy rather than for unnatural productivity and
prone to illness, about reusing old things instead of throw-away
society, and, really, you can apply it to any area of life that you
wish. It isn't anti progress or anti technology but pro sustainability
and pro responsibility.
The excellent BBC programme A Farm for the Future is a good start if I
have woken your interest.
http://www.blinkx.com/video/a-farm-for-the-future-01/3PoPI8VF5JiuIM5Eig_mCA
Poseted on SwordOfPower Forum
27 May 2009
A message from the author of "The Toltec
Teachings" series and spiritual teacher Theun Mares:
"Congratulations to you and your team for a truly LOVELY website! Well
done and good luck! B-:)
One thing that came to mind when I was reading the contents of your
website, is the analogy of the candle I use in the books.
The
personal power of each and every man and woman can be likened to that
of a candle flame. Some candles and their respective flames are big,
whilst others are small, and some even tiny. But ALL of us have at
least SOME personal power.
My message in this is that we do NOT
have to be great warriors of the spirit, we do NOT have to be shakers
and movers of the world, but IF ALL of us, each and every ONE of us
were merely to light our candles, big, small or tiny, and STAND
TOGETHER, what a LIGHT there would be in the world – a light that will
literally, not figuratively, but LITERALLY transform the world
overnight! The only thing that stops us from doing so is humanity’s
sense of apathy, separativeness, the prejudices, preconceived
assumptions and many judgements of the mind, and human pettiness! Drop
this, even if just temporarily in the spirit of intelligent
co-operation so as to offset the very immanent and very REAL darkness
and evil threatening to destroy all life upon our planet, and suddenly
the impossible becomes possible."
|
|